View Full Version : 7.62N vs .308 win
hnter
11-10-2006, 09:50 PM
Mil 7.62X51 (7.62 NATO) is specked to higher pressures than SAMI specs.
Gil Martin
11-11-2006, 05:11 AM
hnter,
This topic comes up from time to time. The link below covers the subject very well. All the best...
Gil
http://www.thegunzone.com/30cal.html
Adam Helmer
11-11-2006, 02:03 PM
hnter,
I just read Gil's link and it seems there is not any standardization even among NATO nations about the 7.62 NATO round each produces.
I have heard various comments about the .308 Winchester and 7.62x51mm rounds. On page 56 of the 9th Edition of the book, "Cartridges of the World" it says, "Historical Notes: (for the .308 Winchester) Introduced by Winchester as a new sporting cartridge in 1952, the .308 is nothing more than the NATO 7.62x51mm military round."
Personally, I have had two Match M14s in my life and have several .308 rifles, one is a Remington Varmit .308. Among the M14s, Remingtons and two Indian .308/7.62x51mm arms, I have shot Factory .308 ammo as well as lots of US GI Ball (LC 69 and LC 70) through them all and have never noticed any problems, real or imagined. I think COTW is correct on page 56.
I have yet to see a box of Factory .308 Winchester caliber hunting ammo with a warning: "Do not fire in a 7.62x51mm arm." (Or vice versa) My M14s would have been non-compliant in any event since they shot lots of US Factory .308 Winchester ammo, they just did not know they were 7.62 NATO. Whatever.
Adam
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.