| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			And the .270 doesn't hold anything over the .280 and .30-06 in any deer hunting situation. 
 
Mike Moss, 
 
I didn't twist anything. That is the data that Barnes' reloading manual shows for the bullets, cartridges, and velocities I used.  If you were to look at my first post, you would see that I wasn't endorsing the .270 as the perfect deer gun. In fact, if you read all of my posts on this thread, you would know that I was making an argument for my .300 Win Mag, not my .270. Find the lb/ft for the bullets I listed and let me know what you find. Sure, I could find data for a .270 bullet that is much less aerodynamic and post those numbers, but that wouldn't be the truth. I guess I could have looked at a lot more data, plugged it all into a spreadsheet, and then come up with some type of answer. However, I use a 130 gr. bullet in the .270 for deer and a 150 gr. bullet in the .300 Win Mag for deer, so I used the data for those bullets.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				The pond, waterfowl, and yellow labs...it don't get any better.
			 
		
		
		
		
		
			
				  
				
					
						Last edited by fabsroman; 12-10-2004 at 09:02 PM.
					
					
				
			
		
		
		
	
	 |