[fabsroman]

Val,

I thought I answered your question, but I guess you need it to be as short as possible.

In essence, you have not received justice because he must receive justice before we take his life. If there is any possiblity that he is not guilty of murder, it should be listened to.

By the way, how much discovery do you think the Public Defender does? Do you think they do as much as the OJ Simpson attorneys did. Do you think they hire investigators that specialize in this stuff or forensics guys that specialize in this stuff.

At the end of the day, if there is NEW evidence that shows that this guy might not be guilty, like the DNA evidence in Illinois, he should get a new trial.

Sometimes, evidence is overlooked in trials and courts nowadays are not too willing to postpone trials and back up dockets so that a huge amount of discovery can be done.

In the end, it is all about justice and making sure that he gets his before you get yours. He has a lot more to lose than you do in this situation.

Did that answer your question, or should I limit it to a single sentence?