|
just think
you can spend so much more on a kimber and have that same bad exsperince with it that yo had with your ruger.
id seriously save your cash and get more for your money in glass. i think. i know id be better of spendinh 500 bucks more on my glass than i did on my rifle.
heck maybe even savage or remington. spend 400 bucks on the rifle and 600 on the glass and youd have one heck of rig.
i just today ran into guy packn 300wsm win featherlight with some cheap tasco scope on it. those are pretty good rifles alittle spendy. to bad his scope was about as cheap as they come. think his cost bout 50 bucks.
they are a few exseptions to the rule but most rifles will shoot when givein the chance. and all have the possibility born into them that they may not shoot facotry ammo or may be touchy to load for. wether you spend 400 on them or 1000.
but unless you have good glass you can never blame the rifle.
Evan
i am very much a ruger guy. my opion is very biased. but that is not based on owning just rugers. ive saved and spent my heard earned money to get remingtons and winchesters aswell. havent yet justufied spending more on kimbers and the like when i may not get more for that money.
|