|
I also have stumbled onto this little wildcat and I think you all have been to modest so far. It may not be the best thing since sliced bread but it is an amazingly useful cartridge. My one complaint has been the relative lack of load data. The newer powders give it even more versatility. I would like some opinions on my brainstorming. The 260 remington appears to be a twin to this cartridge in every way with the exception of .007 bullet diameter. If my math isn't screwed up, that's only three per cent difference! where bullet weights are equal or nearly so, wouldn't it reasonable to at least use that data as a starting load? I sure would like to hear from someone who has this stuff all worked out. My chronograph no.s really have me drooling so far.
|