View Single Post
  #3  
Old 08-31-2006, 01:41 PM
BILLY D.'s Avatar
BILLY D. BILLY D. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MINOT (MINDROT) ND
Posts: 1,498
mn

the weight depends on how they were cofigured, but normaly they weigh around 8+ #s. given the choice between the m-16 and the m-14 i'd take the 14 everytime.

one consideration for hunting is the mag capacity. i don't know whether your state allows high cap. mags. in my home state you are limited to 5 cartridges in the firearm. check your state game laws.

as far as hunting with a semi auto, people have been doing it for years. remington makes a great semi auto, but it does take some maintenance to keep it running. the m-14 takes less care, it was made for battle field conditions and it works. you can drag it through a slough and it will fire. i know.

as far as the optimal hunting firearm i think there are better choices. as far as accuracy and dependability are concerned i wouldn't hesitate to utilize one.

just my 2¢ worth.
__________________
HAPPY TRAILS

BILL

NRA LIFE MEMBER 1965
DAV
IHMSA
JPFO-LIFE MEMBER

"THE" THREAD KILLER

IT' OK.....I'VE STARTED UP MY MEDS AGAIN. THEY SHOULD TAKE EFFECT IN ABOUT A WEEK. (STACI-2006)

HANDLOADS ARE LIKE UNDERWEAR...BE CAREFUL WHO YOU SWAP WITH.
Reply With Quote