If I read the article correctly, the gunowner brought the weapon out and handed it to a friend without verifying it was unloaded. The 'friend' cocked it, didn't see a round and pulled the trigger while it was pointed at his 'friend' and shot him in the back killing him. So, as near as I can tell, the gunowner deserved to be shot and the 'friend' deserves to live with that for the rest of his life. Just my opinion after reading the article. I don't know how he was brought up but I was brought up to ALWAYS make sure a firearm is unloaded before handing it to anyone. I was also brought up to never point a firearm at anything I wasn't willing to shoot and kill...PERIOD. Just my opinion based on the article.
__________________
USAF Retired
Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorius triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat.
Theodore Roosevelt
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things
|