![]()  | 
	
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				270 wthby mag, 24 or 26 inch barrell.
			 
			
			
			if you were going to buy a 270 weatherby mag, would you opt for the 24 or 26 inch barrel if you had a choice? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	gun used for antelope-deer-possible back up on elk. gun will be shot in open-country, gun will also be up tree stands, shooting fairly close quarters. most shots however under 300 yards. thanks.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			I know alot of people how like the 24" bbl's and think the 26" is too clumsy to carry,, but I have always thought that in the weatherby calibers the longer the better,, may not be true,, but ine all carry the 26" tube
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Boliver E. Shagnasty ESQ. Hated of America is the default position of failed individuals and failing states "Niet geschoten is altijd mis" A shot never fired will always miss  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				hofts
			 
			
			
			I have a 270 Weatherby Mag with a 24" barrel, a 300 Weatherby Mag with a 24" barrel and a 7 Weatherby Mag with a 26" barrel.    Personally. I prefer the 24" especially walking through aspen groves and high brush and deer, antelope, and elk won't know the difference. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Muledeer  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Without the 26 in barrel the 270 mag is just another 270.  The reason I will not own a magnum is because I don't like long barrels.  Many times I've seen nimrods with 7mm mags and 22 inch barrels.  Their only fooling themselves.  A 7m-08 with a 22 inch barrel will out perform a 7mm mag with the same 22 inch barrel.  I will admit that the short barreled magnums make a big flash and bang.  That's what nimrods really like.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			Well if you want a 28" barrel but do not like the overall length of the rifle then get a compact single shot action  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			   the rifle with a 26" barrel will likely be the same length or shorter even than a bolt action with a 22" barrel.I do feel that some folks make a Mountain out of a Molehill over this overall legth thing    have never really had a problem with it myself and it amazes me that the upland hunters seem to get by using semi auto shotguns with 28" barrels without too many problems.
		
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	"Don't let the bastards grind you down"  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			Having chronoed all my rifles, 24 and 26", I'd definitely go the 26. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			That little 2" difference really shows up. JMO Dan 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Lifes not meant to be a journey to the grave with the intentions of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thouroughly used up, totally wore out,loudly proclaiming.... WOW.....WHAT A RIDE.......  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			Dear Hofts; 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			I want to offer my opinion on your bbl length question. Are you planning on carrying this rifle in heavy brush, open field, or a little of both. I think optimum accuracy and maximum bullet punch will come from a 26" barrel. But, bullet placement with any calibre or barrel lenght is critical and humane! 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Bruce  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			Bruce.........the original post is 2001 .............man I hope he got his plans in order by now!
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			Hey Sky; 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			Thanks, I just saw the date on that post. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Bruce  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				REGISTER DATE
			 
			
			
			actually, 2001 is when i registered.  the posted date on the bottom is actually around 5-5 if i remember correctly.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	anyway thanks for all your input. i am prob going to go with a 280 rem anyway. thanks again.  | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |