Hunt Chat  

Go Back   Hunt Chat > Tools of the Trade > Military/Surplus Arms

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old 08-23-2005, 04:49 PM
Adam Helmer Adam Helmer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mansfield, PA
Posts: 3,865
Brithunter,

With all due respect for your experience and training, I think you got it a bit backwards. I shall enumerate and wish you will clarify any faults in my thinking:

1. The U.S. Springfield rifle was adopted in 1903 and had aperature AND windage adjustable sights from day one. Your last two sentences in paragraph 2 of you prior post are in grave error.

2. The Brits dropped the magazine cutoff in 1916 and never re-introduced it to my knowledge. No other nation did re-introduce a magazine cutoff after WWI, which Mark and Number had such a feature in British service?

3. Windage adjustable sights are needed due to changes in ammunition, light conditions, soldiers to whom individual arms are issued and weather conditions. Rifles on "zero" in Africa may not be laterally "On" at Narvik. Different lots of issue ammo had different dispersions. How would "training" zero my issue MkIII?

4. Finally, what arms did the Brits have "right up to WWII" that were superior to the U.S. Garand, M1911A1 pistol, M1 Carbine, BAR, and Thompson. When did we achieve "catch up" with the Brits in WWII?

Where do you get your military firearms information?

Adam
__________________
Adam Helmer
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.