![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bill>>
I'm no competitive shooter, but I do shoot often. I'm into reloading for my rifles, my dad's rifles, and, not uncommonly, for friends' rifles [who are interested in a more accurate load]. I've tried a number of different rests, including the ones that cradle the whole rifle. For me, nothing beats a good, solid, tripod, metal-based front rest topped with a sand bag, combined with a rabbit-eared rear sand bag rest. With the front rest, it is easy to crank an adjustment for elevation. With the rabbit ears, gently squeezed by my non-shooting hand, it's easy to fine-tune the rifle position to bring those cross-hairs right on target. That said, there are less-expensive front rests available. Midway offers one made of aluminum, from Caldwell, for $75 (without bag). Hoppe's also makes one, which you can also get through Midway, for $52. I've used both, but I prefer the Caldwell. Since neither are iron, they are significantly lighter, and therefore, probably a little less stable than the more expensive rests. They are probably more fragile, too, but I've not yet dropped one, and hope not to, so I don't know how they'd hold up. To offset the lighter weight, I add #9 lead shot to the front sand bag and to the base of the rear sand bag, (probably illegal for competitive shooting, but a non-issue for me). I've practiced with Harris bipods as well, which I'd strongly recommend. I use these regularly when hunting, so I like to be comfortable while shooting with them. But, I don't use them when fine-tuning a load because I don't believe that a bipod is as stable or repeatable a platform as the afore-mentioned rests. Anyhow, that's my take on the subject. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|