![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yes, I have had my .270 load pressure tested by the H.P. White laboratory. A bit pricey but worth it. The load has also proven safe in three different rifles. You might want to check out the latest issue of HANDLOADER MAGAZINE. Interesting article on the .270 Winchester. On page 64, he show a chart where he compared the .270 Win. vs the .270 WSM. The relevant part for me is the comparison between 150 gr. bullets as that is all I use in my .270s. .270 WSM with 24" barrel.........3,011 FPS .270 Win. with 22" barrel..........2,988 FPS WOW! A whole 23 FPS faster in favor of the WSM. ![]() I agree that the .280 is not doing well, but I feel that is Remington's fault for sticking in a semiautomatic in the first place where chamber pressures had to be kept lower than what could decently be loaded in a proper bolt action. But that's Remington's screw up, not the fault of the cartridge. I have nothing against some of the new cartridges. I just personally see no real need to buy one. I currently have more rifles than I'll ever need for whatever that's worth. Why should I dump what I have in order to get the "new and improved" when I don't see that much improvement? I go along with the late Elmer Keith's philosiphy in that, "I believe that every man should be allowed to scratch his own fleas in what ever manner pleases him." There will always be people who will run out and buy the latest in firearms and new cartridges. I've done that for more years than I care to count. I feel I've learned a thing or three in the 55 plus years I've been shooting and just don't get too thrilled over the newest and greatest (?) wonder round to come down the pike. I feel I've done my share in keeping remchester and Winnington solvent. I'll leave it to you younger guys to carry one. Paul B. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|