![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Maximum Effective Range
Quote:
Another bad feature is (actually a function of velocity loss also), is that beyond 100 yards or so, the ball drops like a rock, making EXCELLENT RANGE ESTIMATION AND TRAJECTORY knowledge totally indispensable to making a hit on distant targets. In addition, all ML bullets are greatly affected by crosswinds, and round balls are the worst! During the revolution, there were "wall guns" or "fortress guns" made to be fired from the walls of forts, that shot round balls of 1" or larger, and these could be used effectively by experienced shots out to 500 yards or more against stationary targets like standing horses or wagons. By the time of the American Civil War, the Minie ball, a conical bullet, had replaced the round ball for muzzleloading infantry rifle ammunition. The Minie was pretty much in universal infantry use by both sides after 1862. These .58 caliber bullets were capable of shooting the majority of their shots into a 3-foot square at 400 yards, and could be used to kill artillery crews out to greater distances than that! Yet, most commanders still insisted in using the linear, massed-formation close-range tactics of the Napolionic era, causing horrendous casualties given the increased range and accuracy of the rifled musket vs a smoothbore. Quote:
To start, you'd be well advised to limit shots at game animals to 125 yards or less, particularly if shooting a patched round ball. As you gain experience and confidence, you can determine your own answer to this question!! ![]()
__________________
"It seems very difficult to impress most reloaders with the fact that every rifle is an individual, and what proves to be a maximum load in one may be quite mild in another, and vice versa." Bob Hagel, GAME LOADS AND "PRACTICAL BALLISTICS FOR THE AMERICAN HUNTER, 1977 The inmates are still running the asylum! "If you are 20 years old and not a liberal, you have no heart. If you are 40 and not a conservative, you have no brain!" W. Churchill ![]() Last edited by eldeguello; 02-12-2005 at 09:12 AM. |
|
|