|
|
#11
04-21-2005, 08:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is nothing but typical Feinstein, Kerry, Gore and Kennedy, (along with a few others, but no doubt started by a memeber of this crew), ploy to take one more step at getting our guns.
PBR, I have a truely hard time understanding you. I have talked to you in private and other places, and it appears to me that you actually do like to hunt and shoot. Then, you come off with more of this extremeist liberal bunk. Just because you dont like 50 cals, or someone at your local range was a little rude with their AR15s while you were shooting you 22lr, has no bearing whatsoever on whether or not they should be legal or not. What does have a bearing is another brick in the wall, chink in the armour, toehold, or whatever you decide you want to call what the liberal, anti gun movement, aimed at taking mine and your weapons away from us. The way I see it, 50cal will probably be construed to cover the most popular black powder rifles and the new SW500 pistol as well. And, Ill give you a clue, the "bad guys" are gonna get these weapons, no matter what. Its like banning fully automatic weapons. Ok, I cant own one, unless I wanna go to jail. Should I decide to flip out and go on a shooting spree, I would bet all I have, I could own one before dark. And then, go on my shooting spree. What has the law accomplished? I can still get it, just not legally. The sane Andy thats typing this cant own a automatic weapon, but the whacked out one thats ready to kill a bunch of folks can have one in a matter of hours. What purpose did this law serve? So "you" dont like 50 cals. (Or ARs or other assult weapons from your other posts and discussions.) So what. Dont buy one. But, do you like your hunting and shooting weapons that you do own? Well, you better start paying attention and get rid of this "I dont want one, so its ok to ban it attitude." Thats the exact liberal extremeist attitude thats gonna take all of our weapons. Soon. Andy 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode