|
|
|
|
#1
10-28-2005, 08:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Like so many other things, rigorous barrel break-in procedures were copied from competitive shooters - and have little or no usage in field guns.
A Winchester M-94 doesn't need barrel break-in. The ONLY benefit that MIGHT come out of it would be marginally less fouling and easier cleaning. Repeat "marginally." A 94 isn't inherently accurate enough to demonstarte any improvement that break-in might show. Nor does it operate at high enough pressure or velocity to foul badly. So it'd be as pointless as downdraft wings on a moped.
__________________
Freedom of the Press Does NOT mean the right to lie! Visit me at my Reloading Room webpage! Get signed copies of my Vietnam novels at "Baggy Zero Four" "Mike Five Eight" 
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
