 
			
				08-19-2006, 10:52 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
				
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
					Join Date: Dec 2003 
					Location: St. Louis, MO 
					
					
						Posts: 97
					 
					
					
					
					
					     
				 
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
	
	
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				Originally posted by Rocky Raab  
Andy, quigley answered it for me. 
 
I've been a long-standing non-magnum advocate.  I'm not quite anti-magnum, but I'm definitely a non-magnum kind of guy.   
 
There simply are very, very few instances where a magnum anything is absolutely necessary - and also very few people who can take advantage of those few opportunities.  Paper ballistics simply do not equate to real-world field results.  A cartridge that has a couple of inches less drop and a hundred feet per second more speed at a given range means absolutely nothing when the shooter has to contend with unknown range, unknown wind, moving game and mirage - not to mention a hammering heart, wheezing lungs and a flood of adrenalin.   
 
Add all that into a compact, lightweight rifle that really whacks the shooter with blast plus recoil, inspires at least a dollop of subconscious fear AND is expensive to feed with factory ammo;  you have a package that seldom gets shot in practice (at ANY range) .  It's a combination that I frankly cannot recommend to a stranger.  So I don't. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 that sums it up as well as i have ever seen it.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
			
			
				 
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
	
	 |