If we could, should we?

[skeet]

I voted no..mainly because it seems most of the feel gooders that want to get involved in these types of endeavours seem to want to control people(us the hunters) rather than manage the critters. They have to manipulate for their own "political agendas" If they were able to bring back the passenger pigeon for instance..do you think that you would ever be able to hunt doves again?? Us dumb hunters would not be able to tell the difference you know!!?? And truly..the wolf "re-introduction" was actually no such thing. Then they put wolves on an endangered species list when they are not anywhere near endangered..Good grief..the whole mess has gotten out of control.. To the detriment of other animals.. Look at the devastation that has occured to so many animals in the name of NOT wearing fur. So many of the fur bearing animals are predators..that prey on many critters we hunt. As an example foxes coons possums etc have devastated the quail in the South and East as has the protection of the raptors. Yes there are other reasons too, but... There is always a reaction for every action taken..many times things not even dreamed of

[Rapier]

Nope, gone is gone for a reason, lets not muck with the system. It is survival and that is how survival works. Some AH in an apartment in NY City wants wolves, they can have all the wolves they can take care of and feed, right in their apartment. Fool with my business and it is pat, pat, pat, I am the top of the food chain in my woods.

Yeah tho I walk through the valley I shall fear no evil for I am the baddest mother in the valley.
Ed

[FromBearCreek]

Hell yeah. I want to go mammoth hunting.